Publication, Black Holes and Tachyons.
Letter to Planetarium Freiburg, c/o DESY und CERN, dated 9.6.08
„New Journal of Physics“, my attempt of a publication,
Copyright 2009 with the author Harald Birgfeld.
Publisher, author, editor: Harald Birgfeld. By email: Harald.Birgfeld@t-online.de.
s. also: Four publications
ISBN 3-937264-64-7
Theory and utopia of the own time
with additions of 2009.5.5, 2009.7.18 and 2009.12.3
Harald Birgfeld
Translation by the author
|
Harald Birgfeld xxxxxxxxxxxxx 79423 Heitersheim xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Heitersheim, den
25.04.2009 e-mail Adresse: Harald.Birgfeld@t-online.de im Internet unter: www.Harald-Birgfeld.de Publication: Stated
by an example, see my letter dated 2008.06.09, to Planetarium
Freiburg, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron,
DESY and European Organization for Nuclear Research Wissenschaftliche Direktion,
CERN, I publish today the principles of my theory: Theory
of the own time. 1)
Each event has an own time. 2)
Each event takes place in an own
time. 3)
Events can be only simultaneous, if
there is no gap. 4)
Gap is the meeting with another
time. 5) Time is the
perception of an event. Utopia
of the own time 6)
Event without own time is infinite. 7)
Own time without event is eternal. 8)
Events, simultaneously and infinitely and eternally, e.g. are Black Holes and Tachyons.
Harald
Birgfeld in July 2009. |
Letter to Planetarium, Freiburg
|
Planetarium Freiburg Harald
Birgfeld Vortrag zum Thema: Die Zeit der
Welt xxxxxxxxxx, Bismarckallee
7g
79423 Heitersheim
79098 Freiburg i.Br. xxxxxxx Heitersheim, den
9.6.08 e-mail Adresse: Harald.Birgfeld@t-online.de im Internet unter: www.Harald-Birgfeld.de
Ladies
and Gentlemen, very
honoured author of the lecture, in
the tasks, DESY in Hamburg and CERN in Geneva, research centers for particle
physics, I am already interested for decades. Therefore
you permit me please few critical notes. For
the opinion example of the lecture of the Planetariums in Freiburg, „Tea cup
falls to ground “, including their „resurrection “, I would like to omit
myself not further. Condition: ·
Some events can be proven to the object,
collision proton, in a particle accelerator, with a collision with other
collision protons. Statement: ·
The collision proton is not the elemental
proton. Proof:
·
The observation of the objects,
collision protons, is falsely directed on observing the elemental
protons. Collision protons and elemental
protons are vitally different objects. The
collision proton is opposite the elemental proton more heavily, existed in another time and it is shorter. My
comment: ·
Statements about connections between collision
protons and the elemental protons, by so-called events in
the particle accelerators with the attempts of the research centers for
particle physics, e.g. DESY and CERN, are unrealistic and unproven. Collision protons and elemental
protons are
vitally different objects. ·
In the accelerated collision protons
practically no time passes. The observer from the outside namely notices
events, but these do not happen in the reality of the collision protons at
all. Collision protons exist at the
same time at least in one other time than the observer. Yours
sincerely, Harald Birgfeld |
*)
My attempt of a publication with „New Journal of
Physics “ (NJP).
Over the Internet address: http://uploadfiles.iop.org. I sent on
2008.06.17 a copy of my letter of 2008.06.09 as editorial contribution.
|
Harald
Birgfeld xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 79423
Heitersheim xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx e-mail Adresse: Harald.Birgfeld@t-online.de im Internet unter: www.Harald-Birgfeld.de e-mail From: Johanna Schwarz [mailto:Johanna.Schwarz@iop.org] Dear
Mr. Birgfeld, we
received today your submitted comment to a lecture in the Planetarium in
Freiburg and are not safe us whether it was really for New Journal of Physics
intended. We quite publish comments, which refer before however under normal
conditions on one with us published article. I
would ask you to communicate to me as soon as possible whether it concerns in
this case perhaps only a mistake, or how we are to understand the comment in
the other case. Yours
sincerely, Johanna
Schwarz Dr Johanna Schwarz |
|
e-mail From: Harald Birgfeld [Harald.Birgfeld@t-online.de] Dear Mrs. Doktor Schwarz, thank you very much for your fast reaction. Your Institute addressed
letters is a copy from me already to the Planetarium of the etc. sent letter.
In deed the first part of this, my letter, a comment is actual to the lecture
in Planetarium, which is carried content wise by DESY and CERN. The copy of this letter to your Institute was sent of me, in hope on
at least one reader, that recognizes the problem of the highly accelerated
protons in the particle accelerators and likewise analyzed whether the
collision protons can be actual still the elemental protons. It shows the simple proof chain set up by me in the
second part of the letter that the highly accelerated collision protons are
falsely identified with the elemental protons. Collision protons cannot be
identical to the elemental protons for the reasons specified in my letter.
The highly accelerated elemental protons exists e.g. in another time than the
observer. The so-called „search for the pin in heap of hay “, takes place
therefore, in my opinion, at an object and/or in a time, which cannot be
noticed and/or of the observer at all. Differently, than with the edited version of the problem as in my
letter happen, I unfortunately cannot make attentive on the problem at
present. Of the Planetarium, and/or the authors of the lecture, as well as of
DESY and CERN I do not expect an answer. Either my remarks would have sufficiently admit there to be, then all
relevant publications and lectures would e.g. be, „conference of the German
physical society in Freiburg from 3 to 7 March 2008 at the University of
Freiburg. Particle physics, space research and cosmology “etc. a farce, or
the consequences of my proof chain would be from such consequence that one
can not admit them and wants. It would be fantastic, if my letter got a
resonance. Yours sincerely and again best thanks, Harald Birgfeld xxxxxxxxxxxx D 79423 Heitersheim xxxxxxxxxx |
|
e-mail Von: Johanna Schwarz [Johanna.Schwarz@iop.org] unfortunately
I must communicate to you that we cannot accept your comment. As I already
suggested in my last letter, comments are not published without reference
articles in the same journal. Nevertheless
thank you for the submission of your manuscript and further much success
thereby, Yours
sincerely, Johanna Schwarz |